Site Selection Committee Meeting — June 2, 2026

Lebanon WWTP Site Selection — Public Record Archive  |  Return to main page

Video recording (YouTube)  —  Meeting began 4:00 p.m., City of Lebanon Administration Building (overflow capacity exceeded; attendees directed to lobby monitor)

Attendance

Chair Jeff Baines presided. Committee members present: Jody Vance, Tom Clemmons, Steve Jones (engineer, non-voting), Phil Morehead, Joey Carmack, Camille Burdine, Caleb Thorne, Dave Dixon, Randy Lane. Minutes from May 27 were reviewed and approved.

Matrix Update — “Force Main Proximity” Replaces “Service Efficiency”

The committee discussed the fifth scoring criterion from the May 27 matrix, “Service Efficiency.” Jody Vance and Steve Jones agreed the term was ambiguous; Vance proposed renaming it to something reflecting distance from the existing force mains. The committee agreed the new label should capture Force Main Proximity — specifically, the cost and engineering implications of connecting a candidate site to the existing effluent lines. Force main connection distance directly drives capital cost at approximately $4,000 per foot of offset (two pipes, ~$1,000/ft each). Revised force main distances — updated from the May 27 figures to reflect more accurate site layouts — were included in packets distributed at the meeting.

The committee reaffirmed that the current matrix is a preliminary shortlisting tool. A more detailed second-round matrix with additional criteria (endangered species, geotechnical, detailed cost estimates) would be developed once the list is narrowed.

New Sites Added (16–20)

Committee members and members of the public had requested additional sites be added. Steve Jones presented four new sites at this meeting. A fifth (Corps of Engineers property) was also reviewed.

Engineer Updates on Original 15 Sites

Steve Jones walked through updates and refinements for all 15 original sites using new site layout packets. Key points included revised force main distance estimates (measured from closest property corner to required connection point rather than raw distance), estimated construction footprints, and qualitative comments on each site’s suitability. The committee was advised that the additional force main figures had been corrected and clarified in writing. The engineer noted that for cross-street sites (e.g., Sites 9 and 10), the measurement methodology had previously understated distances, which were now revised.

Process and Timeline

The chair expressed the goal of eliminating at least half the sites by the following meeting to give residents of eliminated-site areas certainty. Jeff Baines stated: “My hope is by our next meeting, we can begin to do this vetting process where we can eliminate at least half the sites surely.” (Timestamp: ~22:47)

Committee members were encouraged to review the updated matrix and site packets and to have their initial scoring ready for discussion at the next session.

Public Comment Highlights

Additional speakers voiced opposition to county/rural siting and support for city-adjacent alternatives, particularly the Rockwood property (Site 13/13A area). The meeting was held with the committee at the front of a standing-room crowd; overflow attendees watched from the lobby on a projector.

Next Steps

These notes were prepared by Todd Roark from the YouTube auto-generated transcript of the June 2, 2026 meeting and represent a summary, not a verbatim record. The official minutes, once approved by the committee, are the authoritative record.